Master the fundamental concepts of intermediate representation through this focused micro-challenge.
LLVM IR is the interchange format behind Clang, Rust, Swift, Julia, and many GPU compilers. It is typed, SSA-based, and infinite-register. Reading .ll output at -O0 vs -O2 is how engineers diagnose missed optimizations and undefined-behavior surprises.
A module contains functions. Each function has basic blocks of instructions. Types are explicit: i32, float, pointers. The phi instruction merges SSA values. alloca, load, and store model stack memory.
llvmLoading…
clang -S -emit-llvm foo.c produces .ll text% prefix; globals use @Production compilers embed this step inside a longer pipeline. GCC flows through cpp, cc1, assembly, and ld; Clang uses the driver, Sema, LLVM IR passes, and a target backend. LLVM bitcode, JVM bytecode, and WASM are other familiar IRs at the same layer. The exercise isolates one pass so you can test it alone before chaining it to the next stage.
You will study LLVM IR by compiling C code with Clang and reading the .ll output. This exercise asks you to trace how C constructs map to LLVM instructions and compare unoptimized vs optimized IR for the same source.
Explore LLVM IR by compiling C code and analyzing the output. This is a research-oriented task.
Generate LLVM IR:
clang -S -emit-llvmAnalyze the IR:
Answer questions:
Experiment:
gcc -S -fdump-tree-all outputUse this program to start:
cLoading…
Three hints are available for this task, revealed one at a time inside the code workspace so you can struggle productively before seeing them.
All starter code and reference implementations are available for your local setup.
View on Github